kasa_balavu
Yaqona Dina
On the 25th of February this year, the Oxford Dictionaries Word of the Day was Kava and they posted this image on their social media channels:
I engaged with them on Twitter to argue that their definition was incorrect and insensitive. Others joined in with likes, comments, and retweets, and Oxford Dictionaries said they'd look into it. I also emailed OED via their contact form to properly explain (without the limitations of twitter) why I though the definition was incorrect, mainly arguing that kava wasn't a narcotic (with sources cited) and that "Polynesia" wasn't appropriate. I suggested an alternate definition. I only ever received an autoresponse from them saying that they received too many emails to respond to them all but that my email would be read.
A few days ago I remembered all this and checked their website. The definition hadn't changed, but their website (and domain name!) had and it looked like they had an improved contact/support system. So I resent my old email, hoping that this time someone might actually get it.
This time I received a response, and apparently they had read and acted on my earlier email. The definition has been updated on their premium website and submitted to their other sites to be rolled out in the next update.
BEFORE:
AFTER:
poor quality screenshot of premium.oxforddictionaries.com they sent me
It could be better, but is still a much improved definition IMO. We can't seem to get them to drop "intoxicating" (see MW). Blame Johann Georg Forster for that.
I engaged with them on Twitter to argue that their definition was incorrect and insensitive. Others joined in with likes, comments, and retweets, and Oxford Dictionaries said they'd look into it. I also emailed OED via their contact form to properly explain (without the limitations of twitter) why I though the definition was incorrect, mainly arguing that kava wasn't a narcotic (with sources cited) and that "Polynesia" wasn't appropriate. I suggested an alternate definition. I only ever received an autoresponse from them saying that they received too many emails to respond to them all but that my email would be read.
A few days ago I remembered all this and checked their website. The definition hadn't changed, but their website (and domain name!) had and it looked like they had an improved contact/support system. So I resent my old email, hoping that this time someone might actually get it.
This time I received a response, and apparently they had read and acted on my earlier email. The definition has been updated on their premium website and submitted to their other sites to be rolled out in the next update.
BEFORE:
AFTER:
poor quality screenshot of premium.oxforddictionaries.com they sent me
It could be better, but is still a much improved definition IMO. We can't seem to get them to drop "intoxicating" (see MW). Blame Johann Georg Forster for that.