What's new

Origins of ni-Vanuatu

Status
Not open for further replies.
D

Deleted User01

Looking at the map, one could guess that the original inhabitants of the Phillippines came from Taiwan. Thanks Nabanga. And when they landed on the certain Islands, the kava was waiting for them. We it psychoactive at that time or was it just food? Can you imagine an islander eating his root salad one day and then suddenly exclaiming "Wow, I feel like laying down on the beach and watching the waves crash". Then the local horticulturalist runs to make sure the cuttings from that particular plant were not thrown away.
 

nabanga

Kava Enthusiast
We don't know if they started cultivating and changing the original kava early on whilst in what is now taiwan/ Philippines or later after arrival in present day Vanuatu, but given Vanuatu is where all the noble (man- propagated) varieties are, they probably didn't get to their experiments with cross breeding between varieties till they were settled in Vanuatu.There is no recorded kava use in the Philippines or taiwan (although there is in nearby palau).
What this new DNA analysis has shown is that the first wave of migrants went round the east of PNG without stopping to breed, so they were on a mission to find some uninhabited land. Successive waves, or back- migration, produced in-breeding with PNG but not the first canoes.
I guess the long ago history of kava is hard to investigate as it, or traces on implements like coral grinders, wouldn't have lasted buried for long.
 

Kojo Douglas

The Kavasseur
My understanding has been that the ni-Vanuatu are Melanesians, descendants and of the same haplotype (blood group) of the ancient proto-Australians but influenced by Lapita material culture through waves of contact and diffusion. Remember, Australasia was settled about 50,000 years ago and PNG and Australia were a super-continent until the end of the Pleistocene. There is a pretty epic geographic rift between Australia and the Philippines or Taiwan. And, again, the haplo-groups don't bear any resemblance.

See:

Sillitoe, Paul (1998). An Introduction to the Anthropology of Melanesia. New York: Cambridge University Press
 

nabanga

Kava Enthusiast
I think there's a lot of evidence that island Melanesia (with the exception of PNG) was not originally populated by PNG or Australia, who were originally populated 50,000 years ago as you say - whilst Australia & PNG were still joined together.
Island groups like Vanuatu, Solomons & new Caledonia have language & lapita culture & DNA not found in PNG. The original inhabitants of taiwan & the Philippines were not the present day inhabitants though - there are still some original indigenous Taiwanese left, and they look like modern day Polynesians. The chinese arrived in taiwan much later.
As well as heading to Vanuatu they also headed to Western Polynesia. The migrants arriving in Vanuatu set up trade routes then intermarriage with Solomons who had already had genetic mixing with the eastern PNG islands, which produced the more typical melanesian appearance seen now.
I dont think accepted argument has the old australian/ PNG continent as being the origins of (non-png)Melanesia or western polynesia. Ofcourse there's a lot more to it but that's a breif summary. Interesting stuff..
 

Alia

'Awa Grower/Collector
We don't know if they started cultivating and changing the original kava early on whilst in what is now taiwan/ Philippines or later after arrival in present day Vanuatu, but given Vanuatu is where all the noble (man- propagated) varieties are, they probably didn't get to their experiments with cross breeding between varieties till they were settled in Vanuatu.There is no recorded kava use in the Philippines or taiwan (although there is in nearby palau).
What this new DNA analysis has shown is that the first wave of migrants went round the east of PNG without stopping to breed, so they were on a mission to find some uninhabited land. Successive waves, or back- migration, produced in-breeding with PNG but not the first canoes.
I guess the long ago history of kava is hard to investigate as it, or traces on implements like coral grinders, wouldn't have lasted buried for long.
When you write- "but given Vanuatu is where all the noble (man- propagated) varieties are," do you mean , just the Noble cultivars of Vanuatu? While Vanuatu is most likely the source, all other areas of the Pacific (where kava/'awa/ava/sakau) is traditionally grown have their own, unique, somatic mutation cultivars which were traditionally consumed on a daily basis by those indigenous inhabitants. Eg. the DNA work done in 1998 for 13 Hawaiian cultivars show them as unique to Hawai'i.
 

Kojo Douglas

The Kavasseur
I was 99% certain that the Melanesians of Vanuatu were descended from Papua New Guineans, who are in turn descended from proto-Australians. The Solomon Islands are a kind of extension of PNG, and the people are very similar in appearance and have interrelated languages. The Lapita culture came a bit later, and with it long-distance sea-faring. My limited understanding of the archaeology of Vanuatu is that the islands were inhabited around 3,300 years ago. Fiji was later colonized by these same Melanesians.

However, I have seen these random articles about Melanesians having genetic relations with Taiwan, which is really surprising. I mean, why would Vanuatuans look so similar with their neighbors if they are descended from Taiwanese? Strange.

Now, there is a chance that several ethnic groups converged at some point and spun off newer combinations of blood groups and genetic groups. That is really common in places that are very old and full of migrations. But it is important to remember that Polynesians are part of a completely separate, and far later, migration than Melanesians.
 

Kojo Douglas

The Kavasseur
The gene that produces blonde hair in Vanuatuans, Solomon Islanders, and Australians is the same, and Melanesians are the only ethnic family that have this gene outside of Europe. So I'm struggling to see how Vanuatuans came from Taiwan. I'll have to dig a little deeper...
 

Kojo Douglas

The Kavasseur
Interesting. I'm reading a bit more and it looks like the Lapita migrated out of Taiwan about 3,000 years ago and settled Vanuatu, Fiji, and New Zealand. I'm still not understanding how the genetics of that work. The Maori are also descended from Lapita, and they look nothing like Melanesians. So what does that make Solomon Islanders and New Guineans? They were all directly connected to Australia when it was a super-continent, and I know there are some Lapita archaeological sites scattered around the Solomons.
 

nabanga

Kava Enthusiast
@Kavasseur ..
The proto-Australians and original PNG people didn't get far, other than more recently what is now the eastern island groups of PNG and western Solomons. It has been shown pretty conclusively that Australia and PNG people did not form the origin of the inhabitants of the main Melanesian islands, which were still unpopulated tens of thousands of years after evidence of people in Australia and New Guinea. The Australian aborigines just weren't seafaring folk.
There have been dozens of long detailed studies on migration through Melanesia and Polynesia over the last 50 years or so and the migration patterns are fairly well established - but this new DNA link found on the earliest ever lapita site in Teouma has really ended any doubt that Vanuatu was first permanently settled by the original inhabitants of Taiwan & the Philippines (ie long before the Chinese influence). This was already 99% generally known through language and lapita studies, but they have never had the chance to do DNA analysis of skeletons found at the earliest known lapita site before. I've visited the site a few times over the last 13 years or so since it was discovered - its extremely slow work. It was only found because some expat was making huge excavations for a prawn farm and recognised some of the pottery shards that were surfacing.

The blond hair gene you mention is only generally seen in the Banks/Torres islands of Vanuatu (far north, near the Solomons) and the southern Solomons - you don't see it up in the Western Province or Choisel etc. (You sometimes see it in Santo and even Ambae but this can usually be traced back to a marriage to a Banks islander). So this is a particular genetic trait seen in the area between modern day north Vanuatu & south Solomons - not widespread across the 2 countries. It could well have been brought in by a later back-migration and doesn't necessarily have anything to do with the "origin" question. It is also seen in the eastern island groups of New Guinea like New Britain - so could have come from there some time over the last 2-3000 years to the modern-day southern Solomons or northern Vanuatu.
The Solomons has always been something of a buffer region, being at the centre of trade routes between Vanuatu and the eastern PNG island groups, so all kinds of genetic influences could have spread through that way long after the original colonisation of Vanuatu.

Its a subject that I've enjoyed reading about for years, and there is always something new coming up. I guess the reality is that we can only describe the main migrations, and that there will always be anomalies that will keep researchers busy for a while yet..:bookworm:

@Alia ..yes you're right - I meant "given where all the noble varieties were" not "are" - as in originated from. No doubt other countries have their noble varieties.
 

kastom_lif

Kava Lover
Linguistically, Austronesian and Papuan are two completely different families. Lapita culture people were probably Austronesian speakers.

To get a better idea we have to look at the material culture, language and genetics.

There are Lapita sites in New Britain. There are Papuan speakers as far east as the Western Province in Solomon Islands. As I understand it, Lapita was just the first wave of seafaring people who passed by PNG and Solo. There may have been later movements in the same direction. Then of course we have the more recent westward movement back out of Polynesia (to the "outlier" places like Rennell, Tikopia, Mele, Aniwa, Futuna, etc.)

Edit: Vanuatu may have benefited from the Polynesian back-migration. There was already a big variety of niVan kavas, plus the poly outlier groups brought their favorite kavas with them. It's like sending the best California grapes back to France, you know?
 
Last edited:

Kojo Douglas

The Kavasseur
I'd love to see the research supporting that claim. So many have tried to claim "New World" contact by various groups. The most convincing argument I ever heard was, oddly enough, for Polynesians interacting with the Chumash in California. There are striking linguistic similarities as well as similarities in watercraft.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top