@Andrew Procyk Our "Koniak" is NOT the cultivar called Koniak that Dr. Lebot speaks of. We use the term as the pidgin word locals use for all kava in PNG. I may have to change the name if people here and elsewhere assume or try to claim that it is a certain cultivar that it is not. Interesting about the levels of FKB being hepatoxic. So should we say that 11mg/kg. is the limit? Do you think that acetaminophen should be taken off the shelves? I like the idea of establishing an acceptable ratio of kavalactones to flavokawain. Gives us all something specific without basing it on the name of the cultivar. Many kava producing nations not named Vanuatu are not as diligent at specifying and keeping track of the names of all the growing cultivars, so a test with a specific threshold would be helpful and necessary really. If you'd like to talk further about this, please send me an email, I've got some busy days ahead and I may not be too active on the forum. Good luck with your radio appearance.
Thanks for responding. I will, more than likely, try to call you soon, but I have been crazy-busy as of late as well. Think I might just get all this noise over sooner rather than later, and move the family to the land of kava.
As per 11mg/kg, I would personally not say that is the limit. It could be lower. The 25mg/kg showed damage too, but this follow-up study showed issues at less than half that level.... so my position is that there is too much we don't know to consume without longitudinal evidence in an industry that is "so delicate," so to speak. As per acetaminophen being taken off the shelves - of course not, but it should definitely carry warnings about dosage, damage, use of alcohol, etc. (Instead of just telling people not to, an explanation would be nice.) If we want kava to be considered a "safe food" we should not have to label it with a bunch of warnings.
As per threshold - I will let you know as soon as the colorimetric test is "perfected." That is to say, when Ruth and Vincent figure out how orange is "too" orange (because we don't yet know where the "line" is between yellow and orange) and we figure out what the story is behind the molecules responsible for the color difference - because they are a mystery. It may not give us lactone content, chemotype or cultivar - but it should definitively tell us about the type of kava used, and is easy and cheap!
What spooks me the most is all the neutraceutical companies' products. Has anyone out there EVER seen a kava tincture that is not orange or brown? That would mean some seriously bad news if one considers Lebot's test. (Of course, who knows what color ethanol they begin with?) I know I have not seen a yellow one, and dose-per-dose, people consume MUCH more tincture-droppers than water-based shells, and the solvents pull out a lot more soluble solids, etc... including FKB. (What I was told is 5x's the rate of water!)
So, the question to me is, how do we get the companies with their droppers in every major health food store to realize how important this issue is?
Hopefully, the codex will get filed and accepted expeditiously, and the lousy stuff will simply not be allowed on the market any longer - if someone wants to file an NDI for tudei, they can, and label it accordingly, etc. It does seem to have some anti-cancer properties in lab tests after all... but so does methysticin!
Cheers!
AP