We all know that extracts do not produce anywhere near the effects of full kava root/traditional water extraction, so the medical users in Germany aren't getting all of the benefits that they would if it weren't being controlled by government and pharmaceutical companies.
You make it sound like Germans have always had free access to kava. Kava has *always* been controlled in Germany. It was available only through a doctors prescription until 2002 when it was banned altogether. The good work of the people mentioned in my prior post has resulted in a return to the status quo prior to the ban, which is a good thing for the people who can now get help for their anxiety that works, and for the poor farmers of the Pacific Islands who get higher prices for their kava due to increased demand.
Of course we all want full market access, (to Germany, UK, Australia, Canada, etc) but guess who is doing the work to get that access? The same people mentioned above who some have been trying so hard to tear down
I've found great benefit in several herbs that are either illegal in my area or soon to be illegal.
Let's assume for the purpose of this discussion that you're talking about marijuana. There are a thousand and one strains of weed (assume no new strains can be grown). Like it or not, your govt controls this plant. What would you choose if you had to pick between free and legal access to 700 strains, or a complete ban?
The "you're not the boss of me" reaction for many is a result of the loss of quality of life (no access to medicinal herbs)
Losing access to kava potentially negatively affects quality of life for tens of millions of people. Losing access to Isa/tudei negatively affects a handful of wholesalers/middlemen and a few farmers in the very short term. In fact it's more a hassle than anything else... they won't have trouble selling whatever they still have in their fields and warehouses. They can replant noble cultivars with no trouble at all.
Not to mention the unfairness of one man having the power to tell another how to live his life or what he can or can't do.
Yes I agree that is unfair and annoying. But that's life. I for one would probably be dead if it weren't for the protections I've received from governments that set standards on everything from food safety to road rules. I don't mind trading away some minor freedoms in exchange for a better quality of life.
Look I don't mean to be overly critical of you and I apologize if I've been too blunt. I understand your position and appreciate the chance to debate with you. I know you love kava. We both want everyone to be able to drink kava; we just disagree on which path to take to get there, and I believe my position is the pragmatic one whereas yours is idealistic and counterproductive.