I don't have anything against K@ at all and actually am very interested in trying it sometime. The reason is, is because K@ has taken more heat from the man than kava has and I'm sure there are people who are lobbying right as we speak to try and ban it. It's basically just to keep them separate that way if some shit were to go down regarding K@ there's no tabloids mentioning kava along with it because then your average American middle class family with 2.5 kids isn't going to do research as to what kava really is and will just assume that it's bad. Guilt by association. And I don't believe that K@ is bad, it's just that the FDA says it is and wants it gone. If they had a K@ bar, I would go check it out; as long as it was exclusively K@ that way there not casting a shadow on kava. I just think that because we are dealing with two substances that the FDA doesn't like, one more than the other (K@), than we should keep them sepperated that way if one goes down it won't drag the other one along with it.