The problem is what happens *after* testing is done.With that same token I believe we need to be more careful before we call a Kava Tudei especially with only one session. If further sessions bring the same results then testing needs to be done.
I can't speak for anyone else, but personally I'm "up in arms" not about his opinion, but about his reaction when we no longer had to rely on opinions... when we had test results that proved the kava to be adulterated with tudei.I don't know why everybody's all up in arms about other people's opinions on a product. I can completely understand @Kavasseur having conflicting reviews. Ever had a bad Steak at your favorite restaurant? So many variables going to this wonderful drink, did I squeeze it too hard, let it sit too long, did I not let it sit long enough? I can also appreciate when someone is obviously not bias, every person in here has a favorite and they will always lean towards that and away from others.
Except it was tested by a reputable laboratory and proven to be tudei. N@H then appeared to reject those results. It would have been quite simple (commendable, even) if he'd just said "the adulteration of that single batch was accidental and to correct it I'm going to start testing every batch".On a second note why the hostility towards nakamal at home? I feel like at this point if everything was tested by a professional, not to say that nobody here is a professional but by a reputable laboratory and come back as Noble it wouldn't mean anything for all the draging through the dirt.
I go with bumbling generation. Most of life comes down to clerical errors, Buttle/Tuttle,Mauritania/Mauritius. I fully expect the next German dictator to attempt to annex Australia."Why was there a Civil War?"
I'm thinking it probably did not have K@ in it then, as K@ can mess with your heart functioning via QT prolongation.No, it was just dizziness, jumpy eyes, and a "drunk" kind of feeling. Also, I became very quiet and spaced out.
Yep thats right. Wasn't that long ago that Kava R Us tried passing tudei off to us, and many of us (myself included) bought what he was selling. Remember? Not all of it was tudei, but when @Deleted User called him on it he was really defensive and hostile. His reaction was telling.We're not against vendors, Vlad. We're for the consumers. When a kava presents itself as possibly having an issue, we address that issue. Be it N@H, BKH, or GHK, we're going to bring it to the attention of the consumers here on this forum.
In very low doses K@ is a stimulant but with higher doses visual over stimulation, spins nausea and vomiting are all very common especially in first timers. In a bad K@ experience you want to get horizontal in a dark quiet space with eyes closed, not a social thing at all which makes it a very curious choice to offer in a kava bar? My buddy is always on me to start up a kava bar but in all the years I've been rooting not one convert yet. It tastes like sticks and mud. It's cool more for meI'm thinking it probably did not have K@ in it then, as K@ can mess with your heart functioning via QT prolongation.
The Hawaiian kavas are in the Pom (Polynsian) grouping. The reason they are in a different grouping than the Vanuatu nobles is because genes tend to drift when organisms are separated geographically for a long time, which is what happened when the Ancient Pasifika people carried noble Vanuatu kava eastward to Polynesia. (Vanuatu is in Melanesia, not Polynesia) It doesn't mean Hawaiian kavas are not noble. They are noble. It just means there was some genetic drift over time.I wonder where the Hawaiian varietals would fall on that chart. Are they a separate grouping or would they fall under/close to one of these existing groupings?
Yup. The peoples that moved on from Vanuatu only took noble with them so there is no tudei kava east of Vanuatu other than the Isa that was taken to Hawaii by Lebot and made its way out to the general public.The Hawaiian kavas are in the Pom (Polynsian) grouping. The reason they are in a different grouping than the Vanuatu nobles is because genes tend to drift when organisms are separated geographically for a long time, which is what happened when the Ancient Pasifika people carried noble Vanuatu kava eastward to Polynesia. (Vanuatu is in Melanesia, not Polynesia) It doesn't mean Hawaiian kavas are not noble. They are noble. It just means there was some genetic drift over time.
Really? Fijians and Tongans have always traded, but I wasn't aware that they gave us kava. Is that discussed in the same paper that @verticity mentioned?Apparently Fijian kava came from Tonga.
I'm not sure why Fijian kava is not included in that study. Maybe they didn't have any samples. The "Pom" group actually includes Polynesia (Hawaii and Tonga), and one sample from Pohnpei, in Micronesia. It would be interesting to see where Fijian kava falls. The paper does say this about Fiji:Really? Fijians and Tongans have always traded, but I wasn't aware that they gave us kava. Is that discussed in the same paper that @verticity mentioned?
In any case, that doesn't make it Polynesian kava any more than the Tongan kava from Vanuatu is Melanesian.
Sigh. Still a bit early for Fest season around here, but soon, soon....Man, I hear you. All my drunk friends are dancing around the fire nude. And I'm just sitting there staring with a smile on my face sunk into my lawn chair.