Kojo Douglas
The Kavasseur
Want to be a Kava vendor? Want to get in on the action? Well, first you have to get your Kava tested by a completely illegitimate quality control board. Doesn't even sound legal to me.
I'll remind you again: TK is a very small testing and advocacy organization, not a government regulatory agency. You--or anyone--are free to start your own advocacy organization with different standards. You demanding that TK change it's stance on tudei is as ridiculous as me demanding that you wear a top hat in all the video reviews on your web site.A pseudo-federation that selectively chooses and endorses vendors who conform to their demands. Reminds me of the NFL. "Oh, you want Tudei in your lineup? We won't even endorse your Noble Kava." It's total market control, and as I've said above - the proof is in the pudding. It totally feels like a cartel. Until True Kava agrees that they'll accept Tudei as an option that any vendor can carry - along with certifiable Nobles - then I will refuse to support their Fab Four.
Have you even read this thread?Want to be a Kava vendor? Want to get in on the action? Well, first you have to get your Kava tested by a completely illegitimate quality control board. Doesn't even sound legal to me.
Hey buddy, you need to change your name... the Nether Alderley Yam Network won't stand for this... myself and the other board members of NAYN will be contacting our lawyers, you haven't heard the last of this buster!The South Pacific Yam Network (SPYN) is a real entity that he is in charge of (unlike the fictitious North American Yam Network, of which I am a charter member)
This is all getting a bit silly. As I've said several times TK has done a lot to raise everyone's awareness of tudei and I believe improved the situation for those of use who want to drink only noble kavas but there are so many other vendors who are present on this site that are not tested and yet still do good business. I just don't see the problem.Want to be a Kava vendor? Want to get in on the action? Well, first you have to get your Kava tested by a completely illegitimate quality control board. Doesn't even sound legal to me.
Well it's never easy being a free thinker and trail blazer is it? ;-)Well, in this case I'm being @mobbed.
That's one mighty soapbox you've got there.Great thread, because as they say "All publicity is good publicity".
First, an explanation of my absence, which will no doubt continue for the most part. Since October 2015 both my parents have passed away, I've moved and helped my daughter and sister move, I've spent nearly a month immobile with back issues, and business at my store has nearly tripled. Things are starting to calm down somewhat but I just don't have the time I once did, so I've been concentrating my kava efforts on the big picture, i.e. method validation and Codex submission.
Some points pertinent to this thread:
1. Like it or not, the debate on noble vs two day is closed. All the primary kava producing nations are in agreement, the wheels are in motion, and nothing (including discussions here) is going to change that. If anyone here wants to evangelize for two day, they do it in direct opposition of the kava industry worldwide.
2. True Kava certification is and always has been voluntary. Its popularity even in the light of my extended absence is a testimony to the popularity of the noble cause. TK certification is not a "right", it is in fact it a burden for those who have chosen to comply. And sadly, it has very limited access due to my inability to devote enough time to these efforts. My apologies, but "life happens".
3. TK is not the only kava test lab on the planet. My methods are completely transparent and available to anyone who wants to use them.
4. TK is and always has been completely nonprofit. Though I have accepted donations, I have never charged a single individual or company for any of the thousands of tests I have run. And by the way, donations haven't covered even 10% of the dollars I have invested, not to mention hours of labor. I'm not complaining in the slightest, I just want you to realize that this is NOT a profitable business and never has been.
5. TK is at a crossroads, and there is a major opportunity here for someone who cares about kava drinkers. Considering the interest here and the scores of inquiries from the site, now is the time to take TK to the next level. As vendors are aware, I expected at some point to convert to a "subscription" service, where vendors would pay a flat fee per month for unlimited testing. This would allow for two employees - a "promoter" and a lab tech. No, this isn't a contradiction with point #4, this is a logical progression in a nonprofit entity. If you're honestly interested and have the time, contact me by PM.
I'm sure I've missed something, but these are the major points I have to offer right now.
Garry
"Organic" is a protected term when applied to food products, yes. There are other special terms, like "Halal", "Free Range", "Kosher".Blacklisting vendors because they have Isa in their store is absurd and probably illegal. if you don't have the depth and capacity to treat all vendors fairly and consistently, don't make absolute statements about vendors.
For the meantime, it'll benefit some of us to look at what an entity needs to do to legally establish quality and certification rights. I believe th USDA has strict requirements for the labeling of "organic" foods, for example.
4 certified vendors and we have at least the same number of uncertified vendors that many of us enjoy. I truly don't see the problem.Want to be a Kava vendor? Want to get in on the action? Well, first you have to get your Kava tested by a completely illegitimate quality control board. Doesn't even sound legal to me.
If that's the case, what's the point of having TK in the first place? Just to bury smaller vendors and scare vendors like N@H away from our community?4 certified vendors and we have at least the same number of uncertified vendors that many of us enjoy. I truly don't see the problem.
I totally agree @Kavasseur, I would much rather drink Tudei Kava than ethanol. However my truck would rather have ethanol. Each to his own.There are a lot of complex interrelated issues here. Let me just list them without getting into my positions:
2) Tudei is at the heart of the controversy. There is no substantial evidence that Tudei is unhealthy, particularly when you compare it to other substances like ethanol.
Post of the decade.The color chart cards, we need the color chart cards!
That would make it simple and fast to do. If we have so many scientists on here then why can't we at least get that done. Make an official Kava Forums test card that shows the darkest yellow noble shade, the range of adulterated kava shades, and we just need one for Tudei orange I suppose. I think having the adulterated shades would help vendors tell suppliers, hey man that is good root mostly so stop throwing that other stuff in it. Or they could at least say hey this is 25% or 50% adulterated.
Anyone could buy them and the money goes in to support Kava Forums operating costs. And since we have TK and non-TK certified vendors on here, which is allowed, that would follow the transparent nature of the Kava Forums itself.
With lighting so hard to control and also just human error reading color, I can just hear it now oh that looks a little too yellow. That has too much orange in the yellow. Then oh boy that would have people grabbing pitchforks, it is adulterated grab the pitch forks quick.
@verticity helped me out with the conversion to be able to weigh the acetone and that really made the testing easier for me. He's sciency! But honestly the lighting issues and human error reading color scares me to be falsely accused of something as a vendor on here. And also finding true tudei is hard to have as a control sample, so a 100 percent Tudei color chart card would work great.
We need Kava Forums Acetone Test Color Chart Cards. You know the transparent kind, that you can see through.
I bet they don't give a shit, they're still probably selling plenty of root. Who even looks at the TK site anymore, it hasn't changed in a year? Also people here are more intelligent than to think that they can only buy good kava from those 4 vendors. I still just think this is a manufactured controversy.I would encourage you to ask those "uncertified vendors" how they feel about four vendors having a monopoly on TK certification.
Indeed, I support the idea of TK...but haven't purchased a single TK-certified bag of kava all year.I bet they don't give a shit, they're still probably selling plenty of root. Who even looks at the TK site anymore, it hasn't changed in a year? Also people here are more intelligent than to think that they can only buy good kava from those 4 vendors. I still just think this is a manufactured controversy.
Hey, I never said that. If it looks like the argument is going in that direction then that's someone else's interpretation.There are a lot of accusations going @Deleted User's way that don't seem to make much sense. Unless you have some reason to believe he's getting money under the table from the four approved vendors, why assume bad faith? Why all this talk of a cartel? And the talk of illegality doesn't make any sense either. I can set up an organisation blacklisting and whitelisting who I like, nobody has to listen to me.