It isn't a matter of integrity, it's a matter of seeing things the way you want to see them. We're all subject to it, you've accused me of the same in your statement "You're not fooling anyone when you say you don't care if the acetone test proves to be trustworthy. " in post #203.
"Vested interest": a personal stake or involvement in an undertaking or state of affairs, especially one with an expectation of financial gain.
The concept of independent testing is far from new, and practiced in nearly every industry. Ford doesn't get all insulted when the NHTSA tests their cars, and the local supermarket doesn't call foul when the Dept of Ag shows up to test the fat content of their hamburger. They realize their own vested interest, and that their customers value these independent tests.
Testing for kava hasn't reached that level of sophistication yet, but that is our shared goal. You're not Ford, and I'm not the NHTSA, that's for sure. But I do believe our collective efforts here on this Forum of seeking information, comparing experiences, consulting experts, conducting tests, and advocating for better quality kava in general has had an effect on the industry that will be positive in the long run, however painful you may find it in the short term.
This has been coming since 2002, when Vanuatu realized that quality control was mandatory and passed the Kava Act. Twelve years later they still haven't worked all the bugs out, and neither have we - but we're both a lot closer, and we're not going to make it happen by getting insulted or ignoring the problem.
If you want to slam the door because you feel your integrity has been questioned, go ahead. I'm not in this effort to make friends with vendors, though I certainly have. I'm in it because I believe in kava, I know the help it can bring to the many in need, and I want it to stay legal. With that as my goal, my door remains open to all.
Garry